Investigation of The Pearl Harbor Attack Report

Title:                  Investigation of The Pearl Harbor Attack Report

Author:             Joint Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack

Joint Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack, Congress of the United States (1946). Investigation of The Pearl Harbor Attack Report: A Concurrent Resolution Authorizing An Investigation Of The Attack On Pearl harbor On December 7, 1941, And Events And Circumstances Relating Thereto. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.

LCCN:    46027775

KF25 .P4 1945

Subjects

Date Updated:  December 14, 2015

I read this multi-volume report on Pearl Harbor while a sophomore in college – my history professor told me it was certainly laudable. I was overwhelmed at the age of 17. Volumes and volumes were filled with evidence, including copies of documents and maps. It was an enormous effort to read it all.

After the end of WW II, in November 1945, a joint committee of Congress on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack called Cordell Hull, Secretary of State in December 1941, as a witness. Indignantly, Hull presented a statement about 100 pages long. When asked specifically whether he had foreknowledge of the attack, he stated loudly, “I stood under that infamous charge for months.” Everyone knew, he said, that the claims were lies. The committee exonerated Hull, but of course, the concept lingered on. Evidence points to bad intelligence policy, not to duplicity.

In later years, researchers continued to search for evidence of a conspiracy. James Rusbridger, in Betrayal at Pearl Harbor, suggested that the British had cracked enough of the Japanese naval codes to be able to predict the Pearl Harbor attack. He claimed that Winston Churchill withheld the facts from Roosevelt. But there is no solid evidence that the British had such information, and no evidence that the Japanese sent any messages that would have given away their plans. Despite the unfounded nature of the allegations, they kept surfacing for decades, probably because of the lasting appeal of conspiracy theories.

This entry was posted in Deception and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Investigation of The Pearl Harbor Attack Report

  1. Pingback: Pearl Harbor Warning and Decision | Intelligence Analysis and Reporting

  2. Pingback: Utilization of Intelligence chapter 5 | Intelligence Analysis and Reporting

  3. Pingback: A Matter of Honor | Intelligence Analysis and Reporting

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s