Fighting the Cold War

Title:                      Fighting the Cold War

Author:                 Gen. John R. Galvin

Galvin, John R. (2015). Fighting the Cold War: A Soldier’s Memoir.Lexington, Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky

LCCN:    2014049386

E745.G35 A3 2015

Contents

  • Part I. Pleasant Street — The flashing eyes — Shadows on the ceiling — The Pleasant Street army — If God was mad — My nine lives — Part II. Army life — West Point: a time for testing — Fort Benning: just like artillery, only bigger — Puerto Rico: schooling — Lanceros: continuen — 101st Airborne Division: Hato Rey — Fort Knox and Ginny — Part III. War — First Vietnam — Pentagon: the papers — Second Vietnam: all roads lead to Rang Rang — Part IV. Mixed command and staff assignments — The Fletcher School — Stuttgart: the big staffs — Belgium: Supreme Commanders Goodpaster and Haig — 3rd Infantry Division — 8th Infantry Division — 24th Infantry Division — VII Corps: warrior preparation — Part V. Southern Command — Southern Command, Panama — Honduras — El Salvador — Colombia — Part VI. Supreme commander — Buttressing — The White House and nuclear arms reduction — Conventional forces in Europe — WINTEX, the war game — Change: the right mix — The wall — A strategy for change — The First Gulf War — Red Square — The rescue of the Kurds — The new force structure — The coup — Part VII. Global perspective — Back to West Point, by way of Bosnia — Ohio State University and global strategy seminars — Back to Fletcher: leading and teaching leadership.

Subjects

Notes

  • Foreword by General David H. Petraeus, USA (Ret.).

Date Posted:      August 26, 2015

Reviewed by Joseph C. Goulden.[1]

As the leadership of the United States Army has become intensely intellectualized in recent decades, Gen. John R. “Jack” Galvin gained a deserved reputation as one of the “brainiest generals” ever to don a uniform.

Born into an Irish-American family in small-town Wakefield, MA, Gen. Galvin was a protégé-quality student from the beginning. After West Point he began his career as an airborne infantry officer. His account of the care taken to measure such things as drop-zone wind speeds should bring solace to anyone who has ever jumped out of an airplane.

Next, Vietnam—and here Gen. Galvin’s career took a potentially terminal dip. He was involved in helicopter attack operations, and he and a superior officer did not mesh. So he was shunted back to Saigon as a logistics officer—relieved, essentially. (A later Vietnam tour was successful). During a teaching stint at West Point, he moonlighted as a graduate student at the University of Pennsylvania, studying the poet Yeats. And at one point he almost resigned to teach college full-time.

But a knack for languages—Spanish and German—brought him prime assignments in NATO and Central America. His account of the latter experience shows how the attitudes and policies of local leaders can affect what the United States can do, militarily and diplomatically.

Striking examples are given in Gen. Galvin’s account of his dealings with two Latin leaders during a period when Central America dominated the national security debate. The contrasting figures were Enrique Bermudez, commander of the contra forces trying to oust the Marxist dictatorship of Nicaragua; and President José Napoleòn Duarte of El Salvador, who was fending off a communist-led insurgency.

According to Gen. Galvin, Bermudez spent little time in the field, had no knowledge of the Sandinista forces, and seemed bent chiefly on receiving American aid. His political following outside the military was meager. And the Contras lost their struggle. Duarte, by contrast, recognized his military could succeed only if civilian leaders provided relief to the impoverished countryside.

When a communist squad killed several Marines in a sidewalk cafe, the United States offered to bomb a guerrilla stronghold in retaliation. Duarte refused. The Salvadoran people, he said, would view such attacks as “repaying violence with violence and substituting violence for persuasion.” And, falsely, guerrilla propaganda would accuse “the US Marines of killing campesinos.” No air strikes were made. And Duarte prevailed against the insurgents.

During his 44-year career, Gen. Galvin would hold three major four-star positions: serving as commander in chief of the United States Southern Command in Latin America; the commander in chief of the United States European Command; and as NATO supreme allied commander, Europe.

Gen. Galvin’s greatest contribution to national security was his central role in adapting a post-Soviet NATO to the radical changes in the international balance of power. He was the man trusted by the military to insure America’s national security was not damaged by the drastic arms reductions—especially in nuclear weapons—following the Soviet collapse.

Gen. Galvin also tosses out an intriguing account of an episode during the early days of the Gulf War. The general went with a NATO delegation to Moscow. The Soviet armed forces commander, Gen. Mikhail Moiseyev mildly chided him for a lack of coordination. “If we had pooled our intelligence,” he told Gen. Galvin, “we might have recognized what Saddam Hussein was up to. We could have stopped him with a relativity small cooperative effort. Now it is out of hand.”

And Gen. Galvin also heard a prescient warning from President Mikhail Gorbachev at a later meeting of NATO and Russian officials. He was emphatic that the new Russian state needed to be “governed by law,” with the aid of the military. But by Gen. Galvin’s account, Mr. Gorbachev seemed a bit nervous, and he glanced at Russian military officers at the table when he said, “There are dangers of separatist elements, pro-fascist elements.” In notes written at the time, Gen. Galvin commented that despite expressed military acceptance of Mr. Gorbachev’s reforms, “in an organization as large as the Soviet military, these concepts suffer some attenuation as you go down through the ranks to the bottom of the pyramid.”

A constant theme throughout his book is the necessity of leadership at all levels of command, and to care for troops and dependents. While in Vietnam he realized that his wife Ginny’s monthly checks arrived so late she was always cash-strapped. Galvin had a heart-to-heart talk with bankers that resolved her problem—and that of other military wives.

Fittingly, in retirement Gen. Galvin was Dean of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University training a new generation in diplomatic and military skills. A valuable read for anyone interested in the continuing evolution of the American military.

[1] Goulden, Joseph C., “The Latest Intelligence Books,” The Intelligencer: Journal of U. S. Intelligence Studies (21, 2, Spring/Summer 2015, pp. 110-111). Joseph C, Goulden’s 1982 book, Goulden, Joseph C. (1982). Korea: The Untold Story of The War. New York: Times Books. [LCCN: 81021262], was published in a Chinese-language edition in 2014 by Beijing Xiron Books. He is author of 18 nonfiction books. Goulden is a long-time reviewer of espionage and spy books for The Washington Times, for AFIO’s Intelligencer, for law journals, and other publications. Some of the reviews above appeared in prior editions of The Washington Times or The Washington Lawyer (DC Bar Association) and are reprinted here by permission of the author. Joe Goulden’s most recent book is Goulden, Joseph C. (2012). The Dictionary of Espionage: Spyspeak into English. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications

This entry was posted in Cold War and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s