End of the Cold War, 1985-1991

Title:                      End of the Cold War, 1985-1991

Author:                  Robert Service

Service, Robert (2015). End of the Cold War, 1985-1991. New York, NY: PublicAffairs

LCCN:    2015942161

D843 .S429 2015

Subjects

Date Posted:      July 11, 2016

Reviewed by Joseph C. Goulden[1]

As the Soviet Union teetered towards collapse in 1990, Defense Minister Sergei Akhromeev lamented, “For seventy years the Americans have attempted to destroy our Union and they’ve finally achieved their end!” But his Politboro colleague, Alexander Bessmertnykh, demurred, saying, “It’s not they who have destroyed it but ourselves.”

Left unmentioned was the outside force that played a seminal role in shoving the USSR into oblivion: adroit negotiations by President Ronald Reagan over eight years that (a) forced the Soviets into arms-reduction agreements that lessened the nuclear spectre that had hovered over the world for decades and (b) convinced Moscow that it could no longer match the US militarily, much less economically.

Robert Service, a long-time British academic and—the author of numerous books on the USSR, has produced diplomatic history of the first rank. His story tells of how Reagan dealt not only with strong Soviet opposition to serious disarmament, but with hawkish figures in his own administration who felt that he was going dangerously far.

A strong defense hawk himself, Reagan had a deeper vision: of a world with reduced stockpiles of nuclear weapons, and fewer conventional forces facing one another in Europe. His point man was Secretary of State George Shultz, who gained experience in negotiating with the Soviets as President Nixon’s Treasury Secretary in 1973. And, as Service notes, Shultz lacked the driving—often crippling—egos of previous secretaries such as Henry Kissinger and Alexander Haig.

The Soviet leadership realized early-on that it teetered on the brink of economic ruin. The technological lag was particularly acute in such fields as computers. Even the few achievements were overshadowed by reality—for instance, the scientist who observed that when the first nuclear power station opened, “the nearby collective farm was still using a wooden plough.”

The Soviet dismay is reflected in archival documents which Service accessed, And here we find fascinating insider reading about the secretive communist regime as it awakened to reality. At a Party Secretariat meeting in August 1979, an economist lamented that the USSR was sixty percent less effective than capitalist societies in replacing manual labor. Exorbitant spending on defense, especially missiles, were showing “few indirect benefits in material comfort or cultural facility.” Even hard-liners in the defense agencies “knew that this made no military or economic sense.” As one horrified official exclaimed, “The future’s being eaten up!”

Reagan’s determination to reduce nuclear arsenals in both camps met spirited opposition in his own camp from Defense Secretary Casper Weinberger, who Service writes “had a visceral dislike of anything that implied comprise.” Shultz’s position was that a US refusal to negotiate “would be a free gift of propaganda to the USSR.” Shultz prevailed, and the laborious talks began.

Fortunately for Reagan, his desire for talks coincided with the rise of Mikhail Gorbachev to the Soviet leadership. Gorbachev and Foreign Minister Eduard Schevardnadze were both realists when it came to assessing the dire Soviet condition. They, too, faced strong internal opposition, but ultimately prevailed.

Among the many economic absurdities recognized by Gorbachev were relations with Eastern European satellite nations, most of whom relied heavily upon cheap raw materials from the USSR. As Gorbachev exclaimed, “we can’t endlessly be a fount of cheap resources for them.”

The disarmament talks spanned many years in many locales, and Service’s detailed text becomes tedious at times. And to be sure, bumps in the road were many, ranging from disputes over grain imports to misgivings by America’s European allies about being left defenseless. But Reagan persisted, and he prevailed.

Service’s admiration for Shultz is obvious, but he does give dissenters their voice. For instance, he quotes Frank Carlucci, who succeeded Weinberger as Defense Secretary, as declaring “Gorbachev has bamboozled Europe. Image of peace, compassion, but arms double talk.” Another administration dissident felt that verification of treaty terms “would remain impossible.”

A consistent stalling point was Reagan’s insistence on development of the Strategic Defense Initiative, intended for long-range detection and destruction of incoming enemy missiles. The Soviets insisted SDI was offensive in nature and demanded that it be discontinued. Reagan refused, and SDI development continued.

A continuing Soviet handicap was the failure of the KGB to provide “information and guidance about American politics.” It had no human sources at the top of the administration. “It could disclose nothing important that Gorbachev did not know,” Service writes, based on his examination of archives. And years of adherence to Marxist-Leninist doctrines hampered the Soviet perception of other countries. The key discussion with Gorbachev came in November 1985. As Reagan would report to Congress, he and Gorbachev talked for fifteen hours, five of them on their own, except for interpreters. (This account should put paid to the claims in faux historian Bill O’Reilly’s current book[2] that Reagan was mentally disabled for much of his presidency.)

The end results? Both powers reduced the number of nuclear missiles held on land, at sea and in the air. The Soviets left Afghanistan and agreed to German reunification. Service writes, “As the rapprochement grew, Reagan and his successor George Bush watched with wonder as the USSR dismantled its totalitarian politics and communist ideology and permitted a growing measure of civil freedom and economic reform.” Anti-communist fervor swept Eastern Europe. And, in the end, communism and the USSR went belly-up.

Service correctly calls the process “one of the cardinal episodes of recent world history.” His book should help cement Ronald Reagan’s seminal role in concluding the Cold War.

[1] Goulden, Joseph C. in The Intelligencer: Journal of U.S. Intelligence Studies (22, 2, Spring 2016, pp. 110-111). Joseph C. Goulden’s 1982 book, Korea: The Untold Story of the War, was published in a Chinese-language edition in 2014 by Beijing Xiron Books. He is author of 18 nonfiction books. Goulden is a long-time reviewer of espionage and spy books for The Washington Times, for AFIO’s Intelligencer, for law journals, and other publications. Some of the reviews appeared in prior editons of The Washington Times or The Washington Lawyer (DC Bar Association) and are reprinted by permission of the author. Goulden’s most recent book [as of 2016] is Goulden, Joseph C. (2012). The Dictionary of Espionage: Spyspeak into English. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

[2] O’Reilly, Bill (2015) and Martin Dugard. Killing Reagan: The Violent Assault That Changed a Presidency. New York : Henry Holt and Company. [LCCN: 2015018751]

This entry was posted in Cold War and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s